|The Democratic Party of Multnomah County||We are dedicated to making people's lives better. We work toward an effective government, within the county and statewide, that will protect your rights, count your votes, build the economy, and be accountable. We're the front line for Multnomah County voters.|
The following Multnomah County Democrats have applied and are eligible to be appointed Precinct Committee Persons at the January 10th Central Committee Meeting:
Precinct #3502 Jeston Black
Precinct #3606 David M. Smith
Precinct #3802 Charles Ainsworth
Precinct #3803 Todd Farris
Precinct #4201 Emma Williams
Precinct #4207 Travis Miller
Precinct #4302 Ellen Flenniken
Precinct #4307 Lindsey Capps
Precinct #4311 De Nice Paschal
Precinct #4501 Karol Otto
Precinct #4503 Matthew Mattera
Precinct #4510 Betty Jones
Precinct #4709 Tina Semko
Precinct #5104 Gary Rowell
Multnomah County Demcrats will be considering proposed amendments to our Bylaws, introduced at the December meeting --Article III/Officers of the Central Committee--at the January 10 Central Committee Meeting. All PCPs present at January's meeting can vote on the proposed amendments after debate/discussion. District Leaders have been asked to forward the proposed amendments to their PCPs; copies were provided at the December Meeting and will be available again at the January meeting. Any PCP who did not get a copy at the December meeting and wishes to see the proposed amendments prior to the meeting can contact their District Leader or Rules Chair Mel Harmon at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The amendments come with the recommendations of both the Rules Committee and the Administration Committee (existing officers).
The Organization Meeting (election of officers, State Central Committee delegates and CD Committee delegates) is scheduled for February 21st, 2013.
Why I voted NO on HB 4200, the Economic Investment Impact Act of 2012
"This was a hard vote. I am deeply appreciative of the public, who on short notice communicated their thoughts by email, phone, and personal testimony. I thank my many legislative colleagues--including those on the Special Committee on Economic Development--who worked into the wee hours to incorporate feedback and improve the bill. I will list the positive aspects of HB 4200 before explaining why I ultimately voted against it.
I respect the Governor's efforts over many decades to promote innovative solutions to Oregon's challenges. I am in favor of developing economic tools--including giving companies willing to expand in Oregon predictability about their tax structure--to promote job growth. We need to act expeditiously as well as prudently to balance the short-term needs of recovering from a recession, as well as our long-term needs. We need family wage jobs to fund education, public services, and infrastructure.
I appreciate Nike's unique history in Oregon, and I welcome its planned expansion of at least 500 new jobs and $150 million in capital investment. Our State benefits from the high quality jobs Nike offers in Oregon, the taxes it directly and indirectly generates, its environmental and diversity initiatives, and its corporate, foundation and employee donations to the community. I support working constructively with Nike and other companies to help them grow and invest in our State.
Some of the HB 4200 amendments that my colleagues and I advocated for did increase corporate accountability, reporting requirements, and transparency. I strongly support the change in the bill's sunset from ten years to one year, allowing the Legislature more thoughtful debate during the 2013 Regular Session.
However the following concerns compelled me to vote No:
On Friday, 12/14/12, members of the Oregon Legislature were rushed into an Emergency Session called by Gov. Kitzhaber in an rare process to specifically consider an act regarding the basis of Nike's Oregon corporate taxeds and future jobs. Thursday evening, the night before,the Multnomah County Democrats held our regular monthly meeting. While the Special Session process was too quick for us to duly review the bill and its amendments and then pass a resolution reflecting our feelings, we had a vibrant and thoughtful discussion about this bill. Rep. Alissa Keny-Guyer, Rep. Lew Frederick's LA, Sue Hagmeier, and Sen. Jackie Dingfelder's LA, Andie Short were on hand to both catch us up on the bill and the process, and to listen to our concerns. At the end of the discussion, Multnomah PCPs unanimously expressed support for a No vote in a straw poll question on the Bill.
In the end, amendments to the bill partly addressed some of the concerns widely expressed by our party PCPs, by the public and by a number of legislators. While the bill passed both chambers, not all Multnomah area legislators found that it had been improved enough for them to justify an AYE vote. We commend these Multnomah Legislators - Rep. Jefferson Smith, Rep. Lew Frederick, Rep. Carolyn Tomei, Rep. Alissa Keny-Guyer and Senator Chip Shields for their thoughtful and courageous votes in opposition to the bill.
For a robust sampling of opinion regarding the Special Session and the bill itself, please go to www.blueoregon.com.
Included below is Chair KC Hanson's written testimony as submitted to the Committee. (This was submitted as a constituent since the Party had no time to formalize a response.)